|
||||
The Rushden Echo and Argus, 12th May, 1950, transcribed by Gill Hollis |
||||
Rushden Urban District Council
|
||||
|
||||
Rushden Hall
The Hall Restoration of the Hall grounds is proceeding satisfactorily, but it is considered inadvisable to plant the trees at the present time, and this work has been deferred until the autumn. Seeding has not yet been carried out, and weather conditions will decide whether it is undertaken before the autumn. Rushden Traffic Problem Another attempt to solve Rushden’s High Street traffic problem was made on Wednesday when the Urban Council favoured the introduction of no-waiting regulations. Following consultation with Chamber of Trade representatives, the Highways Committee recommend the introduction of a “prohibition of waiting” rule in Rushden High Street for a trial period of three months subject to the restrictions being effective only between the hours of 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. on weekdays. The scheme would apply to the whole length of road from a point south of Victoria Road to a point opposite the War Memorial and would be subject to the usual exemptions enabling persons to board or alight from vehicles and for goods to be loaded and unloaded. A second recommendation which, like the first, will go to the County Council, was that an Order should be made constituting Coffee Tavern Lane a one-way street to be used only by traffic proceeding from High Street to Rectory Road, with a complete prohibition of waiting on one side of the road. The committee added that the surveyor had been requested to improve the sign-posting indicating the position of car parks near High Street. The report was carried after Coun. W. J. Sawford had related his own experiences of being “moved on” by the police. Petitions Against Increases Three petitions from Council house tenants against the recent rent increases have been received by the Housing Committee of Rushden Urban Council and were mentioned at the Council’s meeting on Wednesday. One was from 98 tenants in Highfield Road, Coronation Avenue, Chester Road, Boundary Avenue, The Crescent and Spinney Road, who considered that the increases were inequitable having regard to the relative amenities of the houses. The second was from 24 tenants in Trafford Road who though complaining of the increase, state that they would be satisfied if electricity was installed at the expense of the Council. The third is an individual protest from the tenant of 146 Highfield Road. The committee reported with regret that they did not feel able to recommend any variation. “I am very sorry,” Mrs. Muxlow told the Council “but under the circumstances it is not possible to alter the rents.” The report was adopted without further comment. |
||||
|
||||