The Rushden Echo and Argus, 14th November, 1930, transcribed by Jim Hollis
Free Church Council’s Protest Letter
Over 40 Houses to be Built
An Expensive Lay-Out Scheme
Several matters of interest were discussed at the monthly meeting of the Rushden Urban Council, on Wednesday evening.
These included a letter from the Rushden Free Church Council, deploring the lighting of shop windows on Sunday evenings by a certain firm in the town, coupled with a request that the Council should endeavour to secure the discontinuance of the practice; the suggested laying out of a piece of land on the Irchester-road at an estimated cost of £500; the question of rent arrears of Council House tenants in addition to several matters in connection with Rushden Hall. Tenders were also accepted for the erection of 46 houses in Tennyson-road.
The letter from the Rushden Free Church Council, which was read by the Clerk, stated that the members desired to call attention to what they felt was a breach of etiquette of the town’s manners by a firm which had recently come into Rushden, lighting up their shop windows on Sunday evening. The letter stated that the Council were aware that Sunday shop window lighting was common in some towns, but that they did not want it to become a common practice in Rushden, and they asked the Council to use all possible influence to secure its discontinuance.
Mr. Coles : “I do not suppose we have any power to force them to stop lighting their windows, but a letter could be sent, and I do not doubt but that it would have the desired effect, as it has done in cases before.”
It was agreed to send a letter to the firm in question.
The Housing Committee reported with regard to rent arrears that they had had before them a revised list of arrears, from which it appeared that all but one tenant had slightly reduced their indebtedness since the last meeting.
The Committee reported that at a further meeting twelve tenants in arrears with their rents were interviewed, and had had pointed out the consequences should the arrears not be quickly cleared and the future rent regularly paid. In all cases promises were made for the early liquidation of the debts. Several letters had been received from tenants unable to attend the meeting, and promising the early reduction of their arrears.
In submitting the Housing Committee’s reports, Mr. L. Perkins, with reference to the rent arrears, said the committee was satisfied that the tenants were making an attempt to get level. There were many tenants three or four weeks in arrears, and they did not want that state of affairs to go on. “It is not always those who are poorest who get behind,” commented Mr. Perkins. “In many cases the husband does not know.”
Attention was called to the prevalence of canvassing the members of the Committee by persons seeking houses. The committee deprecated the practice and intimated that intending applicants would serve their purpose best by confining themselves to the form of application provided at the Council Buildings.
The Clerk reported the receipt of a letter from the Ministry of Health approving the proposal of the Council to erect a further 46 houses on the Tennyson-road, for which it was stated that the following tenders had been received and recommended for approval. 4 houses of the parlour type and 8 of the non-parlour type, Mr. W. Dickens, Rushden, £4,696; 12 houses of the non-parlour type, Messrs. Underwood and Weston, Northampton, £4,464; 10 houses of the non-parlour type, Messrs. W. Packwood and Son, Rushden, £3,750; 12 houses of the non-parlour type, Messrs. Underwood and Weston, Northampton, £4,470, for filling up the pond, as specified, Messrs. W. Packwood and Son, Rushden, £15. It was recommended that application should be made to the Ministry of Health for sanction to a loan of £17,500 for the purpose of carrying out the works.
The recommendations were approved.
Mr. Perkins said, in referring to the tenders, that there were two from outside Rushden, but he thought it was their duty to get as low a tender as possible, as the cost would ultimately fall on the tenants. If the difference was a pound or two per house, it would not matter so much, but in these cases it was too great a difference to be overlooked.
The Committee reported that they had visited and inspected the site and considered the plan for the proposed layout of the vacant piece of land on the Irchester-road, and they recommended the Council that for a distance of about 60 yards, the plot be laid out as an open space at an estimated cost of £500, and that the Baths and Parks Committee be requested to undertake the work.
Mr. J. Roe, chairman of the Finance committee said no provision had been made in the estimates this year for such an amount. He quite agreed that something should be done at that part of Irchester-road, but suggested that the matter be referred to the Parks and Baths committee for them to consider it in their next estimates. The finance committee, said Mr. Roe, were not prepared to negotiate for a loan for such a small amount, but were not prepared to meet it out of the current rate.
Mr. A. Allebone said that if the matter was delegated to the Parks and Baths Committee, he would be of the opinion that it would be desirable to let it out in small amounts. They could make a pleasant and useful spot at considerably less cost than £500. Something must be done quickly, because of the time of the year, but they could make it presentable without spending anything like such an amount.
Dr, D. G. Greenfield said he would like to support the idea, but he did not think £500 was necessary. Would Mr. Perkins, he asked, be prepared to withdraw the amount mentioned and leave the matter for consideration? “The resolution does not bind us to do it this year,” he said.
Mr. A. Wilmott suggested the matter should be placed before the Plans and Highways committee instead of the Parks and Baths. Mr. Perkins: “The matter was brought forward because it is the right time of the year. It is just as well to remove an eyesore, even if you do not spend much money. There is no doubt it is ugly.” He suggested spending a little money in clearing the place with their own labour - the whole scheme might take twelve months, and with the first £100 or so clear away the weeds, etc., and make the spot look more like Rushden. Mr. Perkins said he was quite willing to withdraw the amount of £500, and suggested as an alternative that a small amount be submitted to the Finance Committee each month, in order to get on with the tree planting. Mr. Perkins recommended leaving the matter in the hands of the Housing Committee, as they had a further small layout to consider and did not want to spoil matters by having it in too many hands.
Mr. Roe and Dr. Greenfield agreed to this procedure, and the resolution was then passed. Mr. Spencer said he hoped the committee would make a pleasant place of it.
The resolution that the Parks and Baths committee consider the matter was deferred.
The Council were also recommended to obtain tenders for the making of short lengths of road on the south east side of the open space, with a view to the erection of about 26 houses there next year.
Mr. T. Wilmott asked how much the road would cost.
Mr. Perkins said the amount would be spread over 400 houses. In reply to a question by Mr. J. Richardson as to whether the work would be done by tender or by direct labour, he said that from past experience they had found the expert work, as obtained by tender, satisfactory.
The Hall committee recommended the Council to fence the land connecting the Park with the Wymington-road, with bell top iron fencing, at a cost including gates of £184 10s. 0d., and also erect some stock proof fencing for other places where required.
This was agreed to.
Replying to a question by Mr. Allen concerning the cost of the work, the chairman said it would be met by drawing from the £500 which had been set by to meet such emergencies.
The committee also recommended the installation of hot water heating apparatus in the Hall, with radiators in the downstairs rooms, at an estimated expense of £87 10s.
In submitting the committee’s report, Mr. T. Wilmott said the object of installing the heating apparatus was to keep the house in good order until it was wanted. He stated, in reply to a query from Mr. C. W. Horrell, that the heating apparatus could be extended to serve some of the top rooms, and that the boiler could easily be enlarged.
Mr. Wilmott said he would like to mention how greatly the grounds had been appreciated during the recent fine weather. “Old Rushdenites,” he said, “have said that they have never seen trees, when their leaves were changing , to look so beautiful. I can assure you that the place is very much appreciated. There are half-a-dozen grey squirrels in the grounds, and there is no reason why they should not stop. I wish they were red ones, but I understand they are being exterminated, so we must look after the grey ones.”
An application was received from the Clerk to the County Council for the provision in the Hall, for an Infant Welfare Centre and it was resolved to ask a representative of the Centre to meet the Hall Committee and indicate the nature of their requirements.
The Baths and Parks Committee reported that the Surveyor had submitted estimates for the provision of a full-sized Bowling Green in Spencer Park, composed of either Cumberland turf or Honie turf. After consideration it had been agreed to adjourn the matter for six months.
Mr. Spencer asked the chairman of the Parks Committee if they had considered the planting of shrubs, in addition to trees, beside the brook in Spencer Park.
Mr. Allebone replied that the matter had been considered several times, but it would be an expensive task to carry out. “If necessary we can see if anything can be done,” he remarked, “but it will be most expensive.”
Plans recommended by the Highways Committee were approved as follows :- House in Purvis-road for Messrs. T. Swindall and Sons; two houses in Blinco-road for Messrs. W. Packwood and Son; two houses in Court Avenue for Messrs. A. Bailey, jun. and sen.; extension to factory in Duck-street for Messrs. R. Tarry Ltd.; extension to factory, Irchester-road for Messrs. Radburne and Bennett, Ltd.
A letter was received from Mr. A. Sanders, on behalf of Mrs. White, asking that the stipulation that each of the three houses about to be erected by her in Pytchley-road must be connected with the public sewer by a separate drain, should be dispensed with, but the Committee reported that they were unable to agree to the application.
The provision of 8 standards and fittings for new lamps in Tennyson-road, at a cost of £60 was approved.
It was recommended that the power of the lamps between the War Memorial and Wymington-road be increased to 150 watt, and that the power of the lamp opposite Rose Hill be similarly increased.
Mr. Newberry asked for increased lighting between Wymington-road and Bedford-road, in which vicinity, he said, there were two dangerous corners.
Mr. Horrell said the committee had considered the whole question, and had made recommendations in the resolution, which was then carried.
Mr. J. Spencer referred to the disappearance and obliteration of white lines in the town, and asked if the Highways Committee had made any decision in the matter.
Mr. Horrell said no decision had been made as far as the committee were concerned. They would, if requested, consider the matter at their next meeting.
With reference to Crabb-street, a letter was received from the Clerk of the County Council, with copy of an order, which the Ministry of Transport have advised the County Council, the Minister has decided to make. It was pointed out that the order, as drawn, only applied to mechanically propelled vehicles, and being limited, would not provide a remedy for the existing mischief, which was entirely due to ordinary bicycles. In these circumstances the Highways Committee recommended, unless the draft order could be amended, that no expense be incurred by advertising or erecting warning boards, and the Clerk was instructed to so inform the County Council.
The Clerk read the following letter from the Air Ministry, in reply to the message with sympathy from the Council concerning the loss of the R 101. “I am directed by the Air Council, on their behalf, and on behalf of the bereaved relatives, to express their deep appreciation of your message of sympathy on the occasion of the tragic disaster of the R 101.”
The Clerk read a letter from the Ministry of Transport in connection with the appointment of Traffic Commissioners under the Road Traffic Act, 1930, which asked for the name of one of the Council members to be submitted to the Ministry for the appointment of Commissioners for the district. The letter stated that there was no remuneration attached to the position, but that allowances would be made under the Civil Service, Grade “A” scale.
Mr. C. W. Horrell proposed that the name of Mr. A. Allebone be forwarded, stating that Mr. Allebone was a member of Roads and Bridges Committee of the County Council. This was carried, Mr. L. Perkins seconding.
On the proposition of Mr. Horrell, it was agreed to recommend that the Rev. C. J. Keeler should succeed the late Mr. B. Vorley as a member of the School Managers. Mr. Horrell stated that Mr. Keeler had resided in Rushden for over 20 years and took an active interest in local affairs.
The members present were: Mr. G. W. Coles, J.P. (in the chair), Mr. L. Perkins, M.B.K., B.Sc. (vice chairman), C. W. Horrell, C.A., A. Allebone, C.C., J. H. Hornsby, T. Wilmott, A. Wilmott, T. Swindall, J. Spencer, J.P., F. B. Newberry, J. Roe, C. Claridge, C. Green, J. Allen, J. T. Richardson and Dr. D. G. Greenfield with the Clerk, Mr. G. S. Mason, the Surveyor, Mr. J. W. Lloyd, and the Sanitary Inspector, Mr. F. S. Piper.
............................
|